Season the third, but without the Great Bird.
SPOCK'S BRAIN-- The argument: "Brain and brain-- males are only good for one thing; having their brains sucked out of their heads." "Sorry, my dear, we're going to KEEP our brains where they are. But as a consolation prize, we'll do away with your gynocentric dominatrix culture and restore equity between the sexes-- see later episode TURNABOUT INTRUDER for details."
THE ENTERPRISE INCIDENT-- Now it's time for the Trekkers to play "KEEPING up with the Romulans" by stealing their tech. The only "sharing" is interrupted between Spock and the sexy Romulan Commander.
AND THE CHILDREN SHALL LEAD-- Well, no. Contrary to the Isaiah quote, even godlike powers don't make a bunch of little kids into leaders, any more than it worked for big kid Charlie X. So they have to KEEP to their own lane.
IS THERE IN TRUTH NO BEAUTY? -- The Trekkers think their emissary Spock ought to be able to SHARE the privilege of communing with an alien ambassador. But his "keeper" doesn't like SHARING, though in the end she's forced to do so.
DAY OF THE DOVE-- Not all energy-beings are as saintly as the Organians; here's one that wants to "keep" hostilities between Trekkers and Klingons going at fever pitch. And this time both groups make the existential decision to SHARE a common interest, if only in survival.
FOR THE WORLD IS HOLLOW AND I HAVE TOUCHED THE SKY-- Once again we have a stratified civilization that must be taught to SHARE a common destiny with the rest of the universe.
PLATO'S STEPCHILDREN-- Hey, Trekkers, you can't confine your attacks to Greek gods, but you gotta go after their philosophers too? Still, nobody's going to cry for the Platonians when they're forced to SHARE parity with other sentients.
WINK OF AN EYE-- "No, thank you; we'd rather KEEP clear of your breeding-pens."
THE EMPATH-- Certain aliens demand that Gem SHARE her very life to prove herself. The Trekkers show the ETs that, "Love means never having to SHARE so much that it kills you."
ELAAN OF TROYIUS-- Unlike "Plato's Stepchildren," this time the Trekkers must teach just one arrogant aristocrat how to SHARE for the sake of her people. However, this time the Trekker captain suffers a bit for Elaan having overSHARED with him.
LET THAT BE YOUR LAST BATTLEFIELD-- "No, thank you, KEEP both your revolutionaries and reactionaries to your dead planet."
REQUIEM FOR METHUSELAH-- Neither father nor potential son-in-law get to "keep" the lady fair. All they SHARE is mutual tragedy, though Spock has a different form of SHARING-moment.
THE WAY TO EDEN-- Didn't we already do two episodes about "KEEPING off the Eden-grass?" Oh well, space hippies make everything better.
THE CLOUD MINDERS-- Now let's have the Trekkers teach the haves to SHARE with the have-nots-- and with zero mentions of socialism, to boot.
THE SAVAGE CURTAIN-- Wel, you Trekkers *said* you wanted to SHARE the glory of your Liberal perfection with everyone and everyone's dog. So why would you object to dramatizing your beliefs by acting them out?
TURNABOUT INTRUDER-- If there's one person with whom you don't want to "share" your body and soul, it's your vengeful, possibly hormonal ex. Kirk has to figure out how to KEEP his sunny side up long enough to convince his fellow Trekkers that he's not a victim of gender dysphoria and that he really wants to KEEP his male soul in his male body.
THIRD SEASON EXCLUSIONS-- THE PARADISE SYNDROME, SPECTRE OF THE GUN, THE THOLIAN WEB, WHOM GODS DESTROY, THE MARK OF GIDEON, THAT WHICH SURVIVES, THE LIGHTS OF ZETAR, ALL OUR YESTERDAYS.







3 comments:
"AND THE CHILDREN SHALL LEAD-- Well, no. Contrary to the Gospel saying, even godlike powers don't make a bunch of little kids into leaders"
Actually, it's not a reference to any passage in the New Testament text, but to that of the Tanakh, Isaiah 11:6, "The wolf will dwell with the lamb, and the leopard will lie down with the kid; the calf, the lion and the ox together, and a small child will lead them."
Regarded as a description of the world peace and harmony transforming even Nature which occurs when the Messiah manifests himself (Christians interpreting the passage as a prophecy fulfilled by Iesus; Jews discounting Iesus being the Messiah because he inaugurated no such universal peace), the verse, significantly, describes a child leading animals, not people.
Being a bit more exegetical, while remaining within the lexical boundary, in translating the Hebrew word "lead', one Jewish version renders the Hebrew, " "The wolf shall dwell with the lamb, The leopard lie down with the kid; The calf, the beast of prey, and the fatling together, With a little child to HERD them."
Obviously, the passage is interpreted variously, finding in it metaphors and symbolisms which are applied to people.
But, directly, it doesn't indicate a little child is the leader of any people.
Relatedly, although the New Testament encourages people to practice childlike unpretentiousness, humility, and ingenuousness, no NT verse nor passage teaches that children should be or are equipped to be leaders of adults. Quite to the contrary; the necessity of maturity and experience as qualifications of leadership is a common thread through the NT text.
You are correct sir, and it seems like we discussed this in some other context a while back. And I can well believe that no text literally says children should lead any people, except maybe by symbolic example. In mentioning NT, I was conflating Isaiah with the Matthew quote of Jesus: "Let the little children come to Me, and do not hinder them! For the kingdom of God belongs to such as these,"
Whoever came up with the ST title was reworking the Isaiah quote as if it spoke of literal dominion, but just for ironic effect, since KIrk et al don't think kids should be in the driver's seat at all.
Agreed, regarding the ironic sense intended by whoever chose the title.
One layer of that irony lies in recognizing how often Bible verses are misquoted, applied out of context, and cartoonishly misintepreted.
Sloppily brandishing the discontextualized wording as "And the children shall lead" creates opportunity for the plot to demonstrate negative consequence of inexcusably erroneous, if not dangerous, interpretation.
Post a Comment