ENTERPRISING EXECUTIVES

I've been giving, both in my three-part CLASSIC-LIBERAL TREK essay-series and in a forthcoming review of the first season of the series STAR TREK PICARD, considerable thought to the differing ethical systems of the 1966-68 STAR TREK and the 1987-94 STAR TREK THE NEXT GENERATION. 

My starting point, almost inevitably, is David Gerrold's observation from his popularization of Star Trek fandom, THE WORLD OF STAR TREK: that Gene Roddenberry's creation was President Lyndon B. Johnson's "Great Society in Space." The idea might or might not have been original to Gerrold, but it's substantially correct, with one major amendment. Though Johnson was unquestionably the man in the oval office during the three seasons of The Original Series (henceforth TOS), the two policies with which Johnson is most associated-- the "liberal" policy of the Civil Rights Act and the "conservative" one of Communist containment via the continuation of the Vietnam War-- had their genesis in the tenure of Johnson's predecessor John F. Kennedy. Thus the ethos of TOS, with its skillful balance of Liberal and Conservative ethical propositions, derives from Kennedy-- who incidentally was also the first "space age" American Prez-- to the extent that said ethos derives from any President at all.

Naturally I am not, any more than Gerrold, arguing a conscious attempt by Roddenberry or any of his collaborators to pattern their work after any public statements by any political figure. Professionals producing television shows in that era sought to reach the largest possible audience by transforming political propositions into fictional flights of fancy. Kennedy and Johnson alike should be viewed less as direct influences and more as cultural touchstones.

With that concept of ethos-orientation in mind, how should one regard the ethos of STAR TREK THE NEXT GENERATION (aka TNG). As it happens, two Presidents reigned during TNG's seven years. However, only one held office during the first three years of the show, which also happen to be the years during which Gene Roddenberry's influence over TNG progressively waned, partly due to the poor health that took his life in 1991.

Was TNG a reflection of President Jimmy Carter's ethos of America? Any resemblances may be less evident than the Kennedy influence on TOS. But where Kennedy was precipitate in his decisions, Carter's tenure was marked by caution. Kennedy sought to inspire citizens with high-sounding rhetoric; Carter was more down-to-earth. Most of all, Kennedy told Americans that they should ask what they could do for their country, while Carter, in the wake of the Nixon scandal, told his constituents "I'll never lie to you."

The characters of TNG, in their earliest conception, have one dominant trait in common with Jimmy Carter: over-earnestness. In the 1980s, as Roddenberry saw the franchise he'd created taken over by other hands, TNG gave him his last chance to infuse a teleseries with his guiding ethos. Yet this time he didn't want a series that stressed heroic action and character conflict. As many TNG critics have observed, Roddenberry wanted characters who had advanced beyond personal interest, not least with regard to that old devil sensuality. As the characters lacked personality in those early years, the players couldn't do much except to pontificate-- though always with the most earnest attitudes possible. For me, as a viewer not much impressed with TNG's early years, the culmination of this tendency appeared most egregiously in the first-season episode "Skin of Evil," which I call "The One Where Picard Has Righteous Conversations with an Oil Slick." 

TNG fans would aver that in later years the show transcended that period. I would have to do a complete rewatch to see if I agreed, but I tend to think that the ethos of TNG was always compromised by its impractical nature. And yet, many fans of TNG did not like the first season of PICARD, and I did-- which promises an interesting if one-sided discussion as to where the TNG universe finally took a good turn.